onStrategy

Where is no head, there is no strategy (Case study: Zoom)

May 4, 2023
< 1 minute

Strategy | Business Models | Tech

 

Zoom vs. Exxon

Source: Koyfin


It is crazy to even think that at some point in time, Zoom had a higher market capitalization than Exxon.

The only positive thing about this product is that it is extremely easy to use.

Otherwise, from the strategy point of view will remain a niche product at best:
1/ Free products, or products for which you are already paying, will keep squeezing them: e.g. consumer products (META, Google) and business (Teams)

2/ Zoom’s engineering team is located in China and has many security implications (ie. for sure they are watching what is happening now with the TikTok ban)

3/ Is not part of a bundle product, like Teams; maybe here is an incentive for Salesforce to buy it

4/ Lastly, I think their greatest mistake was trying to spend so much time on the consumer market instead of focusing on solid and constant enterprise revenue. (ie. zero network effects)

At the end of the day, people use Zoom for video conferencing and do not take it as it is promoted: “a unified communication and collaboration platform.”

Discover posts:

Microsoft - Activision Blizzard

Microsoft – Activision Blizzard

  << The European Commission has opened an “in-depth investigation” into Microsoft’s proposed acquisition of Activision Blizzard>> (nme.com) Activision Blizzard is the parent company of World of Warcraft, Call of Duty, Candy Crush, Diablo and many more gaming studios. In 99% of the cases authorities go for companies in the (...)

Read more
Mark Zuckerberg's message to Meta employees

All tech companies are overstaffed

After several discussions with people from “the valley” (ie. mainly friends) I realised that all tech companies are overstaffed, being afraid of: 1. competition – by opening start-ups 2. competition – getting hired by somebody else This reminded me of Snap who’s main ad client for some years was…TikTok. Now (...)

Read more